Home

/

Models

/

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6

Full comparison on pricing, capabilities, and context length — pick the right model for your use case

Anthropic
Anthropic

Claude Sonnet 4.5

The previous-generation Sonnet flagship — excellent coding and agent capabilities. A great fit for teams with tight budgets that still need high-quality code output; the industry benchmark before 4.6.

Input

0.429 金币

Output

2.143 金币

View Claude Sonnet 4.5 details
Anthropic
Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6

Anthropic's most capable model — excels at complex reasoning, long-document analysis, and code comprehension. Significantly improved over 4.5 for math and engineering, the top choice for enterprise-grade complex tasks.

Input

0.714 金币

Output

3.571 金币

View Claude Opus 4.6 details
ItemClaude Sonnet 4.5Claude Opus 4.6

Brand

Anthropic

Anthropic

Input price (per 1M tokens)

0.429 金币

0.714 金币

Output price (per 1M tokens)

2.143 金币

3.571 金币

Context length

200K tokens

200K tokens

Max output

8K tokens

32K tokens

Release date

Tier

Reasoning
Flagship

Code generation

Chain-of-thought reasoning

Vision understanding

Long context

Prompt caching

Tool use

Which should I choose?

💰 Budget priority

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper on output pricing. For output-heavy workloads (code generation, content creation), the price gap materially affects monthly cost.

📚 Long documents / large context

Claude Opus 4.6 has the larger context window (200K). Pick it for large codebases, long-form novels, or legal contracts.

💡 Hands-on recommendation

Sign up for PioModel to call both models with a single API key — just swap the `model` parameter. A $2 top-up is more than enough for side-by-side evaluation.

Frequently asked questions

Q: What's the difference between Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.6?

A: Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Anthropic) and Claude Opus 4.6 (Anthropic) each have their own strengths in pricing, context length, and capability. Claude Sonnet 4.5: input $0.429 金币/M, context 200K. Claude Opus 4.6: input $0.714 金币/M, context 200K. Choose based on your task profile and budget.

Q: Which is cheaper — Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.6?

A: By output price: Claude Sonnet 4.5 is cheaper ($2.143 金币/M).

Q: Can I use Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.6 together?

A: Yes. With PioModel, a single API key works across all supported models — just switch the `model` parameter in your code, no separate account required. Ideal for apps that need different models for different scenarios.

Q: Which is better for coding — Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Claude Opus 4.6?

A: Check the capability table above for each model's support. Claude Sonnet is widely regarded as the strongest coding model, GPT-5 is well-rounded, and DeepSeek offers standout value. We recommend trying both before committing.

One account, both models

Free trial credits on signup. Switch models by changing one line of code.